The structured assessment a consultant would run, delivered as a product — maturity scoring, risk exposure and an audit-ready report, produced by the team that already runs the estate.
See it livescorasec.comMost organisations cannot answer a simple question: how secure are we, actually? The honest answer takes a framework, and the frameworks are written for assessors rather than for the people running the systems.
So it gets outsourced. A consultant arrives, runs a workbook, and leaves a PDF — expensive enough that it happens once a year at best, which is not a cadence that matches how fast an estate changes.
The controls themselves are the barrier. NIST CSF 2.0 and ISO 27001:2022 are written in language that assumes you already know the answer, and most of any framework is irrelevant to any given organisation.
And a score on its own changes nothing. Knowing you are at 63% maturity does not tell an IT manager what to do on Monday morning, or which of a hundred gaps is the one worth the next budget cycle.
Every question is written the way the person answering it would describe their own systems, with context explaining what is being asked and why it matters — so the assessment can be completed by an IT manager rather than an assessor.
Branching logic drops whole sets of controls that are irrelevant to the organisation answering, which is what turns a 170-question baseline into a sitting rather than a project.
Assessments save and resume across multiple people, so the network questions go to the network owner and the policy questions go to whoever actually owns policy, with role-based access holding it together.
Domain-level scoring produces an overall maturity rating and a risk exposure level, then recommendations are ranked by impact against effort — because the point is the order you fix things in, not the number.
AI-assisted analysis drafts an executive brief and a technical summary from the same assessment, exported to PDF, Excel or JSON — one for the board paper, one for the people doing the work.
Three assessment types: an SME cyber health check, a NIST CSF 2.0 baseline and an ISO 27001:2022 readiness review
Over 500 security controls across seven domains, mapped to the six NIST CSF 2.0 functions
Branching logic that skips control sets irrelevant to the organisation being assessed
Save and resume across multiple contributors with role-based team collaboration
Domain-level maturity scoring with an overall rating and risk exposure level
Critical gap identification with recommendations ranked by impact against effort
AI-assisted executive briefs and technical summaries generated from the assessment
Multi-format export to PDF, Excel and JSON for board papers, working files and integrations
Encryption at rest and role-based access control throughout
A security assessment becomes something a team runs itself, in a sitting
Maturity and risk exposure are measured against recognised frameworks rather than opinion
Findings arrive ranked by impact and effort, so remediation has an order
The same assessment produces both a board-level brief and a technical work list
Reassessment is cheap enough to repeat as the estate changes
AI feasibility analysis, extraction and document generation for Dubai Municipality
Reads third-party and internal feasibility documents, fills the financial sheets and forms that follow, and checks the result against ISO, WHO and other international standards.
A walkthrough video in, a removals quote in seconds
The customer films their own home. Computer vision identifies and counts every object, estimates dismantling, handling and transport time, and returns a priced quote.
Secure AI-driven e-learning and assessment platform
A scalable learning platform with AI proctoring — eye tracking, person and mobile detection — protecting high-stakes exams.